Archaeological Field Guide: Essential Tips For Distinguishing Artefacts From Artifacts

soporte.com.ar Team Editor

You need 4 min read

·

Post on Feb 09, 2025

86 visitor like this post

Share

Archaeological Field Guide: Essential Tips for Distinguishing Artefacts from Artifacts

Archaeology is a fascinating field, but it demands meticulous attention to detail. One of the crucial skills for any aspiring archaeologist, or even an enthusiastic amateur, is the ability to accurately distinguish between artefacts and artifacts. While often used interchangeably, there's a subtle yet significant difference that impacts the interpretation of a site and its history. This guide provides essential tips for making this critical distinction.

Understanding the Terminology: Artefact vs. Artifact

The terms "artefact" and "artifact" are frequently confused, even within academic circles. However, a nuanced understanding is vital for accurate archaeological recording.

Artefact: The Preferred Term in Archaeology

In the archaeological community, "artefact" is the preferred and increasingly common term. It refers to any object made or modified by a human being. This encompasses a vast range of items, from intricately carved stone tools to simple pottery shards, from ancient jewelry to remnants of clothing. The key here is human intervention – the object must show signs of intentional shaping or use.

Artifact: A Broader, Less Precise Term

"Artifact", while sometimes used synonymously, has a broader meaning. It can refer to any object of historical significance, which may or may not have been directly made or modified by humans. This distinction is crucial. An artifact could be a naturally occurring object that acquired historical importance – a fossilized bone from a significant site, for example – or it could be a manufactured object. The use of “artifact” can lead to confusion, so sticking with “artefact” is generally recommended for clarity in professional settings.

Distinguishing Artefacts in the Field: Practical Tips

Identifying artefacts requires careful observation and a methodical approach. Here's a breakdown of key considerations:

1. Context is King: The Importance of Location

The context of a find is paramount. Where was the object discovered? Was it within a stratified layer of soil? Its location relative to other finds and features within a site dramatically impacts its interpretation. A stone tool found alongside charred animal bones in a hearth, for example, immediately suggests a different context than the same tool discovered randomly on a field surface.

2. Material Analysis: Identifying Materials

Understanding the materials used is crucial. Is it made of stone, bone, metal, clay, or organic material? Identifying the material helps determine its potential age and function. For instance, the presence of specific minerals can help date stone tools.

3. Technological Analysis: Recognizing Human Modification

Look for evidence of human modification. This could be anything from deliberate shaping or carving to signs of wear and tear from use. Flaking patterns on a stone tool, striations on a bone tool, or traces of polishing on a piece of pottery are all indicators of human intervention.

4. Technological Attributes: Identifying Manufacturing Techniques

Understanding manufacturing techniques is crucial for classification. Consider the methods used to create the artefact. Was it chipped, ground, polished, or cast? Recognizing these techniques helps determine the level of skill and technology possessed by the people who created it.

5. Typology and Comparison: Utilizing Existing Knowledge

Compare your findings to established typologies and known artefacts. Archaeological databases and published research can provide valuable insights into the age, function, and cultural context of similar objects. This helps place the artefact within a broader chronological and cultural framework.

6. Documentation: Meticulous Record Keeping

Meticulous documentation is essential. Record the location (using GPS coordinates), the context of the discovery, the material, and any observable features of the artefact. Detailed photography and sketches are also crucial for accurate recording.

Avoiding Common Mistakes

Several common mistakes can hinder the accurate identification of artefacts:

• Confusing natural formations with human-made objects: Erosion can create shapes that resemble tools, requiring careful scrutiny to differentiate natural processes from human intervention.
• Ignoring the context: Finding an object out of context can easily lead to misinterpretation.
• Insufficient documentation: Poor record-keeping can compromise the reliability of your findings.

By following these guidelines, you can significantly improve your ability to confidently differentiate artefacts from artifacts and contribute to a more accurate and nuanced understanding of the past. Remember that archaeological fieldwork requires patience, precision, and a deep respect for the sites and materials being studied.